IP professionals should not fear AI, they should embrace it
At the beginning of a new age of disruption, those who understand the potential of change will reap big rewards
At the beginning of a new age of disruption, those who understand the potential of change will reap big rewards
The country’s highest court grappled with questions that are fundamental to the future of patent law
Professor Ryan Abbott argues that a recently published Board of Appeal ruling reveals a very different approach to inventorship than the one adopted by countries such as the US, UK and Australia
14 July 2022
Co-published – There is often an assumption that reverse engineering of machine learning models is not possible, however that does not need to be the case
07 July 2022
Despite a USPTO report, the Supreme Court’s decision not to hear the American Axle case leaves many doubtful that there will be any clarity in the immediate future
01 July 2022
Co-published - A guide to drafting applications that meet EPO eligibility requirements
30 June 2022
Moves announced after consultation will affect copyright and database rights, but leave status quo in place for inventorship
29 June 2022
Life sciences innovators are increasingly paying for access to high-quality data
27 June 2022
Presented with oral arguments in the DABUS case about the novel legal issue of patenting inventions made by artificial intelligence, a trio of veteran judges at the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on 6 June appeared to adopt a sceptical stance.
07 June 2022
IAM speaks to IPwe founder about the new patterns of patent deal-making made possible by developing technologies
30 May 2022
Co-published – Key issues to consider when developing an exploitation strategy
26 May 2022
IAM speaks to Yann Ménière of the European Patent Office about how the patent profession can best support Fourth Industrial Revolution innovators
23 May 2022
Unlock unlimited access to all IAM content