Poland rejects Swiss-type claims
On December 1 2015 the Industrial Property Law came into force. Among other amendments, the act introduced a long-awaited change in the rules regarding patent protection for second or further medical use of a known substance or composition, which aligns Polish patent law with the European Patent Convention and European Patent Office (EPO) case law.
Patents for second or further medical use provide an attractive scope of protection, as they are an exception to the general rule that patents can be granted only for new products. For this reason they are widely employed in the pharmaceutical industry. Previously, inventions concerning second or further medical use were claimed in the Swiss format (in accordance with EPO Enlarged Board of Appeals' decision in Eisai). A typical 'Swiss-type' claim is drafted in the following form: “Use of a substance or composition X for the manufacture of a medicament for therapeutic application Y”. However, following the Act revising the European Patent Convention of November 29 2000 and the Enlarged Board of Appeals' decision in Abbott Respiratory, European patents can no longer be granted for inventions concerning second or further medical use which are expressed as a Swiss-type claim. European patent applications for such inventions with a filing or priority date on or after January 29 2011 may contain only claims which take the following form: "A substance/composition X for a specific use in a method of treatment" (so-called 'product-by-use' claims). Such a purpose-related product protection of a known medicament for any further specific use in a method of treatment was clearly permitted by the introduction of a new Article 54(5) in the European Patent Convention 2000.
Until December 1 2015, Polish law had not been adapted to these European developments. The Industrial Property Law clearly stated that the novelty requirement did not exclude the patentability of an invention concerning a use of a substance comprised in the state of the art for the manufacture of a product with a new use. This language was a clear reference to Swiss-type patent claims. In addition, the most recent Inventor’s Guidebook issued by the Polish Patent Office in 2009 states that in relation to patents for second or further medical use, both types of claim – Swiss-type and product-by-use – are allowed. Therefore, under the previous version of the Industrial Property Law, inventions concerning second or further medical use could theoretically still be expressed in the form of a Swiss-type claim, which had been explicitly rejected by the EPO.
The amendment to the Industrial Property Law eliminated this ambiguity by referring exclusively to the product-by-use format in accordance with Articles 54(4) and (5) of the European Patent Convention. Amended Article 25(4) of the Industrial Property Law states that the novelty requirement does not “exclude the possibility of granting a patent for an invention concerning a substance or a composition comprised in the state of the art for... use in a strictly specified manner in the methods of treatment or diagnostic methods... provided that such use is not comprised in the state of the art”.
In addition, in the present form, this provision also clearly allows for patent protection of compositions intended for second or further medical use, whereas previously it referred solely to "substances", which could have raised doubts regarding the patentability of compositions intended for such use.
Although to date the courts have not confirmed the rejection of Swiss-type claims under Polish law, this approach may safely be assumed based on the amendments introduced into the Industrial Property Law. Further, the inadmissibility of Swiss-type claims under Polish law cannot be questionted due to the fact that Article 65 of the Industrial Property Law (which refers to a patent for an invention expressed as a Swiss-type claim) still remains in force. This provision concerns the scope of patent protection, and therefore can still be applied to patents containing Swiss-type claims which were granted before December 1 2015.
Thus, inventors applying for protection of second or further medical use in Poland should no longer claim such inventions in the Swiss format. Since December 1 2015 there is no ambiguity that under Polish law, second or further medical use should be claimed in the product-by-use format – that is, as a product (a substance or a composition) for a particular medical use.
This is an insight article whose content has not been commissioned or written by the IAM editorial team, but which has been proofed and edited to run in accordance with the IAM style guide.
Copyright © Law Business ResearchCompany Number: 03281866 VAT: GB 160 7529 10