Ω is a valid and distinctive trademark, court finds

The Court of Cassation, First Civil Section, has quashed a prior decision of the Court of Appeal of Florence and found that the use of a ladies’ purse clasp in the form of the Greek letter omega – Ω – amounted to valid use of a trademark registration covering this letter (Decision No 14684).

Well-known luxury firm Ferragamo has made use of the Ω mark since 1970 and subsequently registered it with respect to a class of goods comprising ladies’ purses. The fact that the same Ω letter was being used by others, including the well-known Swiss watch producer OMEGA, did not adversely affect the rights claimed by Ferragamo, since such third parties produced goods in a different class from ladies’ purses (and goods considered similar to ladies’ purses).

The Court of Cassation decision represents a departure from decisions issued before the 1992 amendment to the Trademark Law. Those prior decisions either did not acknowledge the validity of trademarks represented by a single letter of the alphabet or found them valid but entitled to a scope of protection restricted to reproduction in identical forms by competitors.


This is an insight article whose content has not been commissioned or written by the IAM editorial team, but which has been proofed and edited to run in accordance with the IAM style guide.

Unlock unlimited access to all IAM content