Last Wednesday, USPTO Director David Kappos appeared before the House of Representative's Committee on the Judiciary to talk about the on-going attempts to get patent reform through the US Congress. It looks like he came under a little bit of pressure. Some committee members were not too keen on answers he gave when asked whether he would favour legislation that specifically ended diversion and gave the office fee setting powers if it became obvious that a broader Patent Reform Act would not be passed.

Want to read more?

Register to access two of our subscriber-only articles per month

Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the IAM experts

Already registered? Log in

What our customers are saying

IAM is the only publication that places a business focus on intellectual property. Readers are given real insight into, and guidance on, managing intellectual property as a true business asset.

Marc Kaufman
Reed Smith LLP


Subscribe to receive access to the full range of premium business intelligence, insights and analysis, as well as our IP directories, guides and daily news.

Why subscribe?