EPO style oppositions would bring substantial benefits to the US, report claims 26 Oct 09
Stuart Graham and Dietmar Harhoff have produced a piece of work that is going to cause a great deal of controversy in the United States. Their paper - Separating Patent Wheat from Chaff: Would the U.S. Benefit from Adopting a Patent Post-Grant Review? - goes right to the heart of one of the most controversial aspects of the proposed US patent reform legislation currently before Congress. Although post-grant opposition ahs found many supporters, among which is the current administration, there are many who reject it out of hand. Well, the latter are not going to like the conclusions Graham and Harhoff come to. This is from the abstract:
Want to read more?
Register to access two of our subscriber-only articles per month
Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the IAM experts
What our customers are saying
You have a great publication! It is the central professional journal in the field of intellectual assets.
Dr Lindsay Moore
CEO and president, KLM Inc Management Consultation
Adjunct Professor of Law, George Washington University Law School
Subscribe to receive access to the full range of premium business intelligence, insights and analysis, as well as our IP directories, guides and daily news.
Register for more free content
- Read more IAM blogs and articles
- Receive the editor's weekly review by email