A US judge last week dismissed a lawsuit accusing Huawei of infringing of 9 patents owned by South Korea’s Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI) after four years of maneuvering. The finding that plaintiff SPH America, LLC lacked standing to assert the ETRI-owned rights also brought to an end four other active cases. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo’s verdict revealed details of the arrangement between the publicly funded R&D organisation and its third party “litigation agent”, and raises questions about how it will proceed with future efforts to monetise IP.

Want to read more?

Register to access two of our subscriber-only articles per month

Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the IAM experts

Already registered? Log in

What our customers are saying

One of the advantages of IAM is that it is high quality and yet still accessible and relevant to the non-specialist chief executives and senior managers who don't know what they don't know about IP. It's an important contribution to the upward IP education of senior managers.

Ian Harvey
Board member
International Intellectual Property Strategists Association (INTIPSA)

Benefits

Subscribe to receive access to the full range of premium business intelligence, insights and analysis, as well as our IP directories, guides and daily news.

Why subscribe?