Why prosecuting Indian pharma patents could be even more difficult than it appears 20 Apr 18
A study released this month sheds new light on the Indian Patent Office’s (IPO’s) application of Section 3(d) of the country’s Patents Act – a controversial section intended to circumscribe the issue of ‘secondary’ rights for pharmaceuticals products. It finds not only that Section 3(d) objections by the patent office have increased markedly over time, but that the provision has been widely invoked against ‘primary’ patent applications to protect new drugs.
Want to read more?
Register to access two of our subscriber-only articles per month
Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the IAM experts
What our customers are saying
IAM is the only publication that places a business focus on intellectual property. Readers are given real insight into, and guidance on, managing intellectual property as a true business asset.
Reed Smith LLP
Subscribe to receive access to the full range of premium business intelligence, insights and analysis, as well as our IP directories, guides and daily news.
Register for more free content
- Read more IAM blogs and articles
- Receive the editor's weekly review by email