More clarity emerges around software patent eligibility in the United States

By Matt Levy

US software patent eligibility may not be the nightmare that some claim, with recent Federal Circuit decisions fleshing out the Supreme Court’s pivotal ruling in Alice

The debate over which inventions are eligible for patenting has gone on for at least a century and a half and shows no sign of ending any time soon. The Supreme Court re-energised the arguments after a 20-year break with its decisions in Bilski v Kappos (130 S Ct 3218 (2010)), Mayo Collaborative Servs v Prometheus Labs (132 S Ct 1289 (2012)), Ass’n for Molecular Pathology v Myriad Genetics, Inc (133 S Ct 2107 (2013)) and Alice Corp Pty Ltd v CLS Bank Intern (134 S Ct 2347 (2014)). There has been much discussion on whether the court has made things better or worse, with some prominent voices arguing that it has made such a muddle of things that Section 101 of USC Title 35 should be repealed altogether.

Want to read more?

Register to access two of our subscriber-only articles per month

Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the IAM experts

Already registered? Log in

What our customers are saying

IAM is a high quality magazine with in-depth articles about intellectual asset management not found in any other publication. It adds value to our profession!

Katharine Ku
Director of the office of technology licensing
Stanford University


Subscribe to receive access to the full range of premium business intelligence, insights and analysis, as well as our IP directories, guides and daily news.

Why subscribe?


Register for more free content

  • Read more IAM blogs and articles
  • Receive the editor's weekly review by email
Register now  
Issue 90