Asia’s antitrust regulators target IP

By Jacob Schindler

Antitrust compliance has become one of the most important aspects of conducting IP business in Asia. IAM shines a light on the region’s key competition watchdogs, their new patent policies and what these mean for rights holders

The innate tensions between monopoly-creating patent law and trust-busting competition law have come decisively to the fore of patent practice in recent years. This is especially true in Asia’s major patent jurisdictions – both developed and developing – where the regulators’ IP policies have become just as important a consideration as the applicable patent laws and the prevailing attitudes of the courts. In the standard-essential patent space especially, antitrust authorities in China, India, South Korea and Japan have all produced policy revisions or major investigative findings in the past year, seeking to bring clarity to a hitherto grey area of legal overlap. Could a consensus on these issues be emerging and, if so, what might this mean for patent owners?

Want to read more?

Register to access two of our subscriber-only articles per month

Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the IAM experts

Already registered? Log in

What our customers are saying

Your magazine is great; a timely and eminently worthwhile read.

Mark S Holmes
Chief executive officer
PatentBridge LLC


Subscribe to receive access to the full range of premium business intelligence, insights and analysis, as well as our IP directories, guides and daily news.

Why subscribe?


Register for more free content

  • Read more IAM blogs and articles
  • Receive the editor's weekly review by email
Register now  
Issue 90