Anyone for tennis? ECJ ruling calls for more structure in FRAND negotiations
The European Court of Justice has handed down its long-awaited decision on the competition law implications of asserting standard-essential patents in Huawei v ZTE
In Huawei v ZTE (Case C-170/13, July 16 2015), the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has tried to strike a balance between the rights holder-friendly practice of the German Orange Book case law and the vague, more infringer-friendly preliminary views of the European Commission in its Samsung and Motorola antitrust investigations, which were based on the concept of the ‘willing licensee’. The ECJ’s latest ruling answers several important questions and provides for some legal certainty. However, as expected, a number of questions remain open.
Want to read more?
Register to access two of our subscriber-only articles per month
Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the IAM experts
What our customers are saying
Your magazine is great; a timely and eminently worthwhile read.
Mark S Holmes
Chief executive officer
Subscribe to receive access to the full range of premium business intelligence, insights and analysis, as well as our IP directories, guides and daily news.