There are now very serious questions to be asked of that Bessen and Meurer $29 billion NPE costs claim 07 Jun 15
We sometimes get accused of being opposed to patent reform in the US. But that is not fair. Our position is a little more nuanced than that. We not only believe that the US patent system – for all its flaws – has been one of the reasons why the US has enjoyed decades of innovation leadership in so many sectors, but also that it has helped incentivise the development of inventions and industries that have massively benefited people across the world. Thus, legislation to change that system needs to be based on hard and compelling evidence that it will provide a net benefit; in other words, that it will do more good than harm.
Want to read more?
Register to access two of our subscriber-only articles per month
Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the IAM experts
What our customers are saying
IAM magazine is, in my opinion, the premier magazine in the space of managing intellectual assets for value creation. It brings a fresh, business-driven perspective, rather than a purely legal perspective, on this issue. I would highly recommend it to anyone dealing with how to manage and drive value from intellectual assets.
David A VandenEinde
Assistant vice president and intellectual asset management leader
Subscribe to receive access to the full range of premium business intelligence, insights and analysis, as well as our IP directories, guides and daily news.
Register for more free content
- Read more IAM blogs and articles
- Receive the editor's weekly review by email