Qualcomm’s spat with the Federal Trade Commission was back in the spotlight this week as a judge in the Northern District of California dismissed the chipmaker’s motion to have the case dismissed. In a 50-page order Judge Koh laid out the grounds of the case in which the commission alleges that the company has abused its dominant position in the mobile chip market through actions like insisting that its customers also take a licence to its patent portfolio — the so-called “no licence-no chips” policy.

Want to read more?

Register to access two of our subscriber-only articles per month

Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the IAM experts

Already registered? Log in

What our customers are saying

One of the advantages of IAM is that it is high quality and yet still accessible and relevant to the non-specialist chief executives and senior managers who don't know what they don't know about IP. It's an important contribution to the upward IP education of senior managers.

Ian Harvey
Board member
International Intellectual Property Strategists Association (INTIPSA)


Subscribe to receive access to the full range of premium business intelligence, insights and analysis, as well as our IP directories, guides and daily news.

Why subscribe?